The first wave of lay offs swept through Fort Bend ISD today as principals were called into emergency meetings, sent back to their campuses to call teachers in to let them know that they had been laid off. Most teachers were pulled out of classes, told they were being let go and sent back into the classrooms to go on about their day. This is just one example of the insensitivity of Fort Bend towards its employees and their respective students. Yes, tough decisions have to be made, but there is a right way to implement them, and laws have to be followed (that aspect will be discussed later).
This "reduction in force" is happening for the second year in a row to help Fort Bend ISD recover some of it's lost income. Some one hundred and sixty teachers were told that they would no longer have a job come next fall. Good teachers. Some teachers were still on their probationary period of two years with the district or were working to get their certification, and some teachers were experienced teachers with over thirty years in the classroom with near flawless records. Some were coaches of both athletic and academic events and some were not.
Were they good teachers? Based on the reasons why they were laid off, it would only stand to reason that they were. Having low test scores or a high number of parent complaints was not one of the criteria for being RIFed. The principals of the schools had no say in the matter. Fort Bend administration was the only entity making these cuts and determining who was laid off. Again, the principals, who know teachers' records and effectiveness in the classroom better than anyone in administration, had no say in who stayed or who left.
How did admin determine who was going to be laid off? Teachers were told that Fort Bend administration first looked at who was on a probationary contract, then at their P.D.A.S. evaluation. This would only make sense, since Fort Bend administration has been on a mission since the start of the year to encourage evaluators to lower their PDAS evaluations of teachers as much as possible. PDAS evaluations have been well known for years to be arbitrary, subjective, and never an accurate evaluation of how effective a teacher really is in a classroom.
For example, Dr. Jenney said this to teachers at the beginning of the year: "Proficient is not a bad/poor rating to receive. In fact, Proficient is considered a high level of performance". However, one high school teacher was laid off who had many years of experience, was an academic coach, and, by the way, was given all proficients in her most recent PDAS evaluation. It didn't matter that her previous PDAS evaluations showed EXCEEDS in more than five areas.
English departments were some of the hardest hit. With some classes already pushing over thirty students to a class, even more secondary teachers were told they would have to leave, meaning one of the fastest growing districts would have more kids, the same number of classrooms and much fewer teachers.
What is terribly sad and ironic is that FBISD offered an incentive program to encourage teachers to resign before the lay offs hit. A teacher would be eligible for this incentive program only if they were not part of the critical need areas. (See previous post). If they WERE in one of those areas, the district wanted to keep them at Fort Bend. Until now. The sad thing is, those that were part of the critical need areas are not eligible for the incentive program, even if the district has changed its mind and decided that now it DOESN'T need them.
When a teacher gets laid off, they are first told to sign a form confirming that they have been informed. Then, teachers were given two choices. They can either resign on their own or they can accept the non-renewal of contract that would come not long after. The district obviously encourages its teachers to resign because at that point any options on the teacher's part are limited and the district doesn't count that person as one of their official lay offs. Human resources will gladly tell a teacher or employee that the last thing a teacher would want on their record is a non-renewal of contract. This isn't exactly true.
There are other options. First, if a teacher resigns, they cannot gain unemployment benefits if they had trouble finding a job the next year. Also, if they resign, filing a grievance would not be an option in most cases because the employee willingly left on their own.
There will be more information posted here on what to do if one is laid off in a school district in Texas, especially in Fort Bend.
"Were they good teachers? It would only stand to reason that they were. The principals of the schools had no say in the matter. Fort Bend administration was the only entity making these cuts and determining who was laid off. Again, the principals themselves had no say in who stayed or who left."--Actually there is a rumor circulating on why the central office is handling this directly and it isn't a pretty deal, if you know what I mean. The superintendent is up to his usual, "Lets make a deal" shenanigans to keep his high paying job.
ReplyDeleteI will pray for you all!
ReplyDeleteWhy would it only stand to reason that they were good teachers? Some perhaps were - all definitely were not and should have been cut last year! The stories I could tell about some of my colleagues shenanigans
ReplyDeleteActually the "bad" ones should have been cut years ago for not doing their jobs. In the past it has taken FOREVER to get rid of "bad/lazy" teachers....I guess budget cuts give the district an excuse to get rid of them.....the problem is due to other circumstances, more times than not these teachers are not the ones losing their jobs, especially if principals have no say in the matter. And many of those teachers who took the incentive to quit are just fed up with all the "stuff"....they are good teachers who have had enough.
ReplyDeleteI was one of these "good" teachers being laid off. I'll let you decide if I really deserved it. I've been teaching for 8 years, and 4 with this district. My PDAS was glowing with one infraction, claiming my objective was not on the board (It was and I asked for the appraiser to return and make the correction. She said she would, but never did.) My principal choked back tears as she told me the news. My students and parents, upon hearing the news cried and asked what they could do to help fight this.
ReplyDeleteThe vast majority of the stories I'm hearing about this are of great teachers being laid off. I still can't wrap my head around it.
I remember several cases from last years mass RIF of Jenneys involving current and former "teachers of the year". Sounds like an admin troll has posted above.
ReplyDeleteOn a side note, if there were over 1400 "bad teachers" in the district then we have some over paid administrators not doing their jobs. I wonder if there are "black lists" circulating the central office during this cut?
And just what is the union doing about it? They aren't saying anything, why? What's going on?
ReplyDeleteI will be praying also but it is worth noting that far too long teachers have sat on the sideline feeling they were untouchable by the blowing winds of political schisms. Elections have real world implications and it is past time teachers get in the fight:
ReplyDeleteOn May 15, 2006, Texas Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn wrote a letter to Governor Rick Perry advising him that the Perry Tax Plan was “fiscally irresponsible”. She warned him that the plan would not pay for itself, and she outlined the year-by-year deficit it would cause. In other words, Perry’s Tax Plan in 2006 had a structural budget deficit built in. He knew it, he was warned, and he signed it, anyway. Read the full letter here. Print a copy of Strayhorn’s letter and show it to your friends and neighbors. Perry got what he wanted. Now, he’s taking the shortfall out of public services and public education. And, Perry is blaming local School Districts for the problem. Way to go, Rick.
http://www.window.state.tx.us/news/60515letter.html
I agree with the previous comment about Perry's budget problems. But Teachers have hardly been sitting on the sidelines.
ReplyDeleteIf anything, it's the majority of conservative Texas voters who absentmindedly vote for anyone who says they're against "spending" or "liberals" or are for "business". Lately the ideological splits have caused people to let go of informative voting and just voting along party lines.
I am so disgusted by Jenny. What a hypocrite. The district is way too top heavy starting with him. I am sad to say that I am very relieved that my youngest child will graduate in 2013. We moved to the area 15 years ago because of the wonderful reputation FBISD had. Things have sure changed...and NOT for the better.
ReplyDeleteI too am wondering about the union. Also disgusted by Jenny. And why, if FBISD is so short of money, are they opening a new middle school in the fall when they have some schools under capacity? And why did they build Ferndell Henry Center for Learning with big bucks, a large alternative school, that houses only 44 students. All this at the expense of losing good teachers.
ReplyDeleteDid you all see this on the news?
ReplyDeleteThat video parody of Jenney made the ABC13 news yesterday: http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=8055170
Ferndell Henry is run by one of Jenney's cronies from Virgina.
ReplyDeletehttp://hamptonroads.com/2010/04/tim-jenney-reaches-texas-hire-beach-administrators